Author vstinner
Recipients Yury.Selivanov, casevh, josh.r, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, vstinner, yselivanov, zbyrne
Date 2016-02-09.09:15:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAMpsgwZpCQy8MZJd-JFn3hm4n2rTBAgKc9oSA_ihFerOMATbNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1455006342.13.0.432655345108.issue21955@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Case Van Horsen added the comment:
> I ran the mpmath test suite with the fastint6 and fastint5_4 patches.
>
> fastint6 results
> without gmpy: 0.25% faster
> with gmpy: 3% slower
>
> fastint5_4 results
> without gmpy: 1.5% slower
> with gmpy: 5.5% slower

I'm more and more disappointed by this issue... If even a test
stressing int & float is *slower* (or less than 1% faster) with a
patch supposed to optimized them, what's the point? I'm also concerned
by the slow-down for other types (gmpy types).

Maybe we should just close the issue?
History
Date User Action Args
2016-02-09 09:15:55vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, lemburg, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, pitrou, casevh, skrah, Yury.Selivanov, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, josh.r, zbyrne
2016-02-09 09:15:55vstinnerlinkissue21955 messages
2016-02-09 09:15:55vstinnercreate