This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients josh.r, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, python-dev, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2016-02-02.17:09:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1454432998.58.0.615586010904.issue26194@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Reopened. Otherwise Martin's comments can be lost in spam.

> Maybe it's also worth to document the change in Python 3.5 and 3.6 documentation with a ".. versionchanged::"?

I don't think this is needed. This isn't new feature, this is just a bugfix, old behavior obviously was incorrect. We don't add the versionchanged directive for every bugfix.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-02-02 17:09:58serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, python-dev, martin.panter, josh.r
2016-02-02 17:09:58serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1454432998.58.0.615586010904.issue26194@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-02-02 17:09:58serhiy.storchakalinkissue26194 messages
2016-02-02 17:09:58serhiy.storchakacreate