Message258483
> I don't really think nanoseconds belong here.
What about milliseconds? I'll leave it for Guido to make a call on nanoseconds. My vote is +0.5.
> If they don't
> exist anywhere else in the module, why should they be suddenly
> introduced here?
The timespec feature is modeled after GNU date --iso-8601[=timespec] option which does support nanoseconds. It is fairly common to support nanoseconds these days and it does not cost much to implement. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-01-17 21:33:15 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, terry.reedy, vstinner, ezio.melotti, cvrebert, SilentGhost, berker.peksag, martin.panter, matrixise, elixir, jerry.elmore, acucci |
2016-01-17 21:33:15 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1453066395.64.0.775404787693.issue19475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-01-17 21:33:15 | belopolsky | link | issue19475 messages |
2016-01-17 21:33:15 | belopolsky | create | |
|