Message258068
I expect whatever message we use will become a Stack Overflow question in fairly short order, so "good enough" is almost certainly good enough here, and I'm massively overthinking the problem :)
However, combining my last suggestion with a variant of Martin's would give us:
"Cannot reuse already awaited coroutine"
The generic "reuse" both eliminated the repetition of "await", and also gets us away from worrying about exactly what the caller was doing. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-01-12 07:11:03 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, vstinner, asvetlov, martin.panter, yselivanov |
2016-01-12 07:11:03 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1452582663.25.0.234783824856.issue25887@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-01-12 07:11:03 | ncoghlan | link | issue25887 messages |
2016-01-12 07:11:03 | ncoghlan | create | |
|