Message258066
Isn’t the combined point of this issue and Issue 25888 to make it only legal to “await” a coroutine instance that has not yet been started? Perhaps “Cannot [re]start terminated coroutine” would be better. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-01-12 06:05:35 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, gvanrossum, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, asvetlov, yselivanov |
2016-01-12 06:05:35 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1452578735.47.0.752981169125.issue25887@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-01-12 06:05:35 | martin.panter | link | issue25887 messages |
2016-01-12 06:05:35 | martin.panter | create | |
|