This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ezio.melotti
Recipients Nan Wu, ezio.melotti, martin.panter
Date 2016-01-01.02:49:46
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1451616587.28.0.518033888313.issue25439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> But maybe I am being too nitpicky and paranoid. Ezio?

IIUC your last example used to work because technically it is an iterable of bytes, but the patch would give an error instead.  Even in the unlikely case someone is relying on this behavior, simply adding .keys() not only should make the code work again, but also make it more explicit and understandable.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-01-01 02:49:47ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, martin.panter, Nan Wu
2016-01-01 02:49:47ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1451616587.28.0.518033888313.issue25439@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-01-01 02:49:47ezio.melottilinkissue25439 messages
2016-01-01 02:49:46ezio.melotticreate