➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author llllllllll
Recipients Arfrever, josh.r, llllllllll, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, python-dev, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, taleinat
Date 2015-12-23.02:44:57
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1450838697.64.0.13614370102.issue24379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> and the latter might give the impression it was some sort of special method/attribute when it was not.

Wouldn't adding this be special because it is specifically reserved by CPython as an implementation detail?

Also, would adding this name (__stub or __stub__) be sufficient to get this patch merged again. I would not mind investigating the gc_head issue after but I view that as a separate issue which is only exercised by this patch.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-12-23 02:44:57llllllllllsetrecipients: + llllllllll, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, taleinat, Arfrever, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, python-dev, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r
2015-12-23 02:44:57llllllllllsetmessageid: <1450838697.64.0.13614370102.issue24379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-12-23 02:44:57lllllllllllinkissue24379 messages
2015-12-23 02:44:57llllllllllcreate