Author martin.panter
Recipients SilentGhost, acucci, belopolsky, berker.peksag, cvrebert, elixir, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, jerry.elmore, lemburg, martin.panter, matrixise, r.david.murray, skip.montanaro, terry.reedy, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2015-12-17.08:35:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
If the timespec allowed any arbitrary number of digits after the decimal point, that would remove any argument about nanoseconds not being supported. It would also mean I could use this in one case where I currently format to two decimal places (my compromise between accurate timestamps and excessive information). Just a suggestion :)
Date User Action Args
2015-12-17 08:35:55martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, lemburg, gvanrossum, tim.peters, skip.montanaro, terry.reedy, belopolsky, vstinner, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, cvrebert, SilentGhost, berker.peksag, matrixise, elixir, jerry.elmore, acucci
2015-12-17 08:35:55martin.pantersetmessageid: <>
2015-12-17 08:35:55martin.panterlinkissue19475 messages
2015-12-17 08:35:55martin.pantercreate