Message256588
Okay, so you have a test with subtests. You have presented three cases:
1. Single subtest which passes. No problem I assume.
2. Two subtests: 1st fails, 2nd passes. This is how subtests are normally used, so I guess there is no problem. Is that right?
3. After two subtests have already run (one of which failed), SkipTest is raised. I guess you want the test results to be reported better in this case.
What is the use case? Why not skip the test before any subtests are started? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-12-17 07:45:12 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, pitrou, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, zach.ware |
2015-12-17 07:45:12 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1450338312.57.0.0467199668082.issue25894@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-12-17 07:45:12 | martin.panter | link | issue25894 messages |
2015-12-17 07:45:12 | martin.panter | create | |
|