Message256568
PEP 492 is provisional, we can change things like this in 3.5.2.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Martin Panter <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
>
> Martin Panter added the comment:
>
> It should always be valid to create a new coroutine instance. Perhaps you
> meant:
>
> instance = foo()
> print(await instance) # Okay the first time
> print(await instance) # Second time should be an error
>
> This seems sensible, at least for 3.6. Maybe it should also be an error to
> re-await if the coroutine raised an exception, and if it was cancelled via
> close().
>
> ----------
> nosy: +martin.panter
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25887>
> _______________________________________
> |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-12-16 23:53:31 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, ncoghlan, vstinner, asvetlov, martin.panter, yselivanov |
2015-12-16 23:53:31 | gvanrossum | link | issue25887 messages |
2015-12-16 23:53:31 | gvanrossum | create | |
|