Author abarry
Recipients David MacIver, Kevin Shweh, Tijs Van Oevelen, abarry, arigo, donmez, ezio.melotti, fijall, ncoghlan, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, torsten
Date 2015-12-13.19:40:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1450035615.8.0.713737187314.issue25843@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm not suggesting to get rid of the rich compare ability of code objects, which makes sense to me. What doesn't make sense to me, however, is when a function's code object is replaced by another one because it compares equal. I see no use case for this, and only leads to head-scratching.

I believe code objects should not be touched at all.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-12-13 19:40:15abarrysetrecipients: + abarry, arigo, rhettinger, ncoghlan, donmez, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, torsten, fijall, serhiy.storchaka, David MacIver, Kevin Shweh, Tijs Van Oevelen
2015-12-13 19:40:15abarrysetmessageid: <1450035615.8.0.713737187314.issue25843@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-12-13 19:40:15abarrylinkissue25843 messages
2015-12-13 19:40:15abarrycreate