Message255179
I don't think most of the version numbers are very important here and I wouldn't change them unless there is a valid reason.
> -3.4 and 3.5, first fix it in ``3.4`` and then merge ``3.4`` into ``default``
> -(which holds the future 3.5).
> +3.5 and 3.6, first fix it in ``3.5`` and then merge ``3.6`` into ``default``
> +(which holds the future 3.6).
This change looks wrong to me. In the original text, 3.4 and default are branch names. There won't be a branch named 3.6 until late 2016.
> -For versions 3.4 and before, this was conventionally done when the final
> -release was cut (for example, 3.4.0 final).
> +For versions 3.5 and before, this was conventionally done when the final
> +release was cut (for example, 3.5.0 final).
This also looks wrong to me.
I'm +1 to commit the following changes in devcycle.rst:
> -There are 5 open branches right now in the Mercurial repository:
> +There are 6 open branches right now in the Mercurial repository:
> -- the ``default`` branch holds the future 3.5 version and descends from ``3.4``
> - (RM: Larry Hastings)
> +- the ``default`` branch holds the future 3.6 version and descends from ``3.5``
> + (RM: Ned Deily)
> +- the ``3.5`` branch holds bug fixes for future 3.5.x maintenance releases
> + and descends from ``3.4`` (RM: Larry Hastings)
It might also worth to update the build-dep command in setup.rst. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-11-23 15:50:56 | berker.peksag | set | recipients:
+ berker.peksag, ezio.melotti, matrixise, willingc |
2015-11-23 15:50:56 | berker.peksag | set | messageid: <1448293856.83.0.945464181447.issue25704@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-11-23 15:50:56 | berker.peksag | link | issue25704 messages |
2015-11-23 15:50:56 | berker.peksag | create | |
|