Message25367
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
What's the status of this patch? It seems like it's ready
to checkin. Since this change isn't b/w compatible, should
we do anything to fix these in 2.5? For example, bug
1590036. We could add recursion checks one by one, but I'm
tempted to ignore 2.5. It seems too little of a gain to fix
2.5 and 2.6 in incompatible ways for such unlikely bugs like
these. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:31:56 | admin | link | issue1202533 messages |
2007-08-23 14:31:56 | admin | create | |
|