Message252997
The rationale behind "platform_default" relates to what we put in the default config file in the RPM. If enable/disable are the only options, then as soon as the first version ships with "disable" as the default, affected systems will *never* switch to being enabled by default unless the system administrator changes it.
By contrast, if we put "platform_default" in the default configuration, then inattentive sysadmins could theoretically eventually have their defaults switched to "enable" at some point.
We don't know yet if we'd ever upgrade the "platform_default" setting, but I think it's worthwhile to retain the option. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-10-14 15:20:20 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, lemburg, barry, doko, janssen, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, alex, r.david.murray, bkabrda, dstufft, rkuska |
2015-10-14 15:20:20 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1444836020.03.0.525206366561.issue23857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-10-14 15:20:20 | ncoghlan | link | issue23857 messages |
2015-10-14 15:20:19 | ncoghlan | create | |
|