Author shanmbic
Recipients belopolsky, gvanrossum, martin.panter, shanmbic
Date 2015-10-05.22:44:10
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1444085051.47.0.826024187542.issue24954@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Yeah , I agree that including '%:::z' might not be necessary at all . Including '%:z' and '%::z' format specifiers will give an upper edge to Python. Although , if not going with '%::z' or seconds offset, for now only '%:z' can be a valuable addition . 
I have rectified my code, corrected the indentations and have added cases , where it will also handle any strings of form '%:z' and '%::z' i.e. any character other than 'z' also raising exceptions for cases "%:" or "%::", where no character is specified (Invalid string).   
In case , if we only go with '%:z' format specifier , I will remove the code for '%::z'. 
P.S. I have filled the contributor agreement form. Thanks for the awesome help here. :)
History
Date User Action Args
2015-10-05 22:44:11shanmbicsetrecipients: + shanmbic, gvanrossum, belopolsky, martin.panter
2015-10-05 22:44:11shanmbicsetmessageid: <1444085051.47.0.826024187542.issue24954@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-10-05 22:44:11shanmbiclinkissue24954 messages
2015-10-05 22:44:11shanmbiccreate