This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Patrick Maupin
Recipients J Richard Snape, Patrick Maupin, brett.cannon, docs@python, eric.snow, flatsieve, ncoghlan
Date 2015-10-05.14:19:09
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1444054749.88.0.333634324057.issue25294@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
concurrent/futures/__init__.py may be a better example than 2to3 for this issue.  It's relatively new code, it's part of the standard library, it's fairly small and self-contained, and it doesn't follow the promulgated standard.

If it's bad code, it should be modified.  If it's not bad code, then the docs shouldn't denigrate the coding style (especially not to the extent of requiring absolute imports in standard library code), because a lot of newbies take the docs to heart and spend a lot of time and energy beating up themselves and others about conformance.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-10-05 14:19:09Patrick Maupinsetrecipients: + Patrick Maupin, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, docs@python, eric.snow, flatsieve, J Richard Snape
2015-10-05 14:19:09Patrick Maupinsetmessageid: <1444054749.88.0.333634324057.issue25294@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-10-05 14:19:09Patrick Maupinlinkissue25294 messages
2015-10-05 14:19:09Patrick Maupincreate