This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients BreamoreBoy, aconrad, belopolsky, larry, mark.dickinson, python-dev, r.david.murray, tbarbugli, tim.peters, trcarden, vivanov, vstinner
Date 2015-09-05.01:25:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1441416322.37.0.937691349335.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> timestamps aren't random, so "statistical bias" is roughly meaningless in this context.

I agree.  I don't think I made any arguments about timestamps specifically other than a consistency with timedeltas.  In the later case, I think all the usual arguments for half-to-even tiebreaker apply.

Let's just leave it at "When in doubt - use Dutch rounding."
History
Date User Action Args
2015-09-05 01:25:22belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, vstinner, larry, r.david.murray, aconrad, BreamoreBoy, vivanov, python-dev, tbarbugli, trcarden
2015-09-05 01:25:22belopolskysetmessageid: <1441416322.37.0.937691349335.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-09-05 01:25:22belopolskylinkissue23517 messages
2015-09-05 01:25:22belopolskycreate