Author vstinner
Recipients Guido.van.Rossum, Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, eltoder, gvanrossum, larry, lemburg, njs, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2015-09-01.16:31:06
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1441125066.53.0.273568456384.issue24912@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Sorry, I don't have time to read the whole discussion. Since we are *very* close to 3.5 final, I agree with Mark:

"Please revert c0d25de5919e. Breaking the interpreter in order to facilitate some obscure use case is unacceptable."

We can reintroduce the feature in Python 3.6 with a longer discussion how to implement it, or ensure that we really want it.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-09-01 16:31:06vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, lemburg, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, larry, benjamin.peterson, njs, Mark.Shannon, eltoder, serhiy.storchaka, Guido.van.Rossum
2015-09-01 16:31:06vstinnersetmessageid: <1441125066.53.0.273568456384.issue24912@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-09-01 16:31:06vstinnerlinkissue24912 messages
2015-09-01 16:31:06vstinnercreate