This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author matthaeus.wander
Recipients ezio.melotti, martin.panter, matthaeus.wander, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2015-07-23.14:15:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1437660935.68.0.363569879874.issue16995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
*facepalm* Yes, I uploaded the old patch twice. Sorry for that.

- Added doc update.
- Added test case that includes all 32 characters codes.

I'm reusing the existing Base32 table generation logic without changes. It has been changed (in 3.4 or so) since the first patch. If the logic is still to be changed as suggested by Martin in Rietveld review, I'd suggest to open a separate issue because it affects the existing Base32 implementation, too.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-07-23 14:15:35matthaeus.wandersetrecipients: + matthaeus.wander, pitrou, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2015-07-23 14:15:35matthaeus.wandersetmessageid: <1437660935.68.0.363569879874.issue16995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-07-23 14:15:35matthaeus.wanderlinkissue16995 messages
2015-07-23 14:15:35matthaeus.wandercreate