This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, srkunze, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2015-07-07.17:39:12
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1436290752.83.0.464644638416.issue24571@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
"finally a Pythonic (i.e. a single, explicit) way to do squeeze out more of our servers'"

I think that you don't understand the purpose of asyncio, then, since squeezing more out of servers is, to my understanding, neither a goal nor something it does (except in the mostly trivial sense that you use fewer threads).

What it does is to make writing correct multitasking code easier.  If you aren't writing non-trivial multitasking code, it doesn't buy you anything.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-07-07 17:39:12r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, yselivanov, srkunze
2015-07-07 17:39:12r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1436290752.83.0.464644638416.issue24571@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-07-07 17:39:12r.david.murraylinkissue24571 messages
2015-07-07 17:39:12r.david.murraycreate