Author barry
Recipients barry, catalin.iacob, jesstess, python-dev, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, zvyn
Date 2015-06-22.22:05:55
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20150622180549.343b50d5@anarchist.wooz.org>
In-reply-to <1435010428.05.0.000926948967956.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Jun 22, 2015, at 10:00 PM, R. David Murray wrote:

>We change the authobj signature to challenge=None, then the first thing we do
>in auth is 'initial_response = authobj()'.  The return value can be the empty
>string or a real initial value, and we send the auth command with '
>'.join(mechanism, initial_response).strip().  Then we do the challenge part
>only if we get the 334.

Sounds good to me.  I'll see if I can work up a patch.  I have a hack in my
testing code to work around the lack of auth in smtpd.  It's not pretty but it
works.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-06-22 22:05:55barrysetrecipients: + barry, r.david.murray, jesstess, sandro.tosi, catalin.iacob, python-dev, zvyn
2015-06-22 22:05:55barrylinkissue15014 messages
2015-06-22 22:05:55barrycreate