Author barry
Recipients barry, catalin.iacob, jesstess, python-dev, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, zvyn
Date 2015-06-22.21:14:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1435007672.95.0.82828932857.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Here's a rough thought for a fix.  Some auth_*() methods require a challenge, but some don't, e.g. auth_plain().  Let's allow authobject() to be called with challenge=None.  If they allow an initial-response, then they can just return the response bytes.  If they return None, then they don't allow an initial-response and so must wait for the challenge (i.e. 334 response code).

I think that would at least restore backward compatibility for AUTH PLAIN.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-06-22 21:14:32barrysetrecipients: + barry, r.david.murray, jesstess, sandro.tosi, catalin.iacob, python-dev, zvyn
2015-06-22 21:14:32barrysetmessageid: <1435007672.95.0.82828932857.issue15014@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-06-22 21:14:32barrylinkissue15014 messages
2015-06-22 21:14:32barrycreate