This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients Ben.Darnell, Yury.Selivanov, asvetlov, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2015-06-12.05:46:44
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Low level review sent.

Regarding the new opcode, it appears the main thing it provides is early detection of yielding from a coroutine in a normal generator, which is never going to work properly (a for loop or other iterative construct can't drive a coroutine as it expects to be driven), but would be incredibly painful to debug if you did it accidentally.

For me, that counts as a good enough reason to add a new opcode during the beta period (just as adding the new types is necessary to fix various problems with the original not-actually-a-different-type implementation).
Date User Action Args
2015-06-12 05:46:45ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, asvetlov, Yury.Selivanov, Ben.Darnell, yselivanov
2015-06-12 05:46:45ncoghlansetmessageid: <>
2015-06-12 05:46:45ncoghlanlinkissue24400 messages
2015-06-12 05:46:44ncoghlancreate