Author bobcatfish
Recipients Fotis.Koutoulakis, bobcatfish, docs@python, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, seydou
Date 2015-06-07.18:25:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1433701529.44.0.528125522094.issue18576@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> If you diffed your patch from a public revision in the main repository, there should be a nice “Review” link.

Ah, thanks @vadmium!!! I've been confused about why some patches get review links and others do not >.<

I'll have a new patch up shortly which is diffed against a public revision and has your suggested changes.

> For autodoc in particular, we prefer to avoid it for the main docs because "good docstring" and "good prose documentation" don't necessarily look alike. 

@ncoghlan for some reason I thought that the main docs were also auto generated from docstrings in the actual modules, but I can see now that that isn't the case.

I'll reach out to docs@python.org to see how they feel about autogenerating the test.support docs.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-06-07 18:25:29bobcatfishsetrecipients: + bobcatfish, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, docs@python, eric.snow, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, seydou, Fotis.Koutoulakis
2015-06-07 18:25:29bobcatfishsetmessageid: <1433701529.44.0.528125522094.issue18576@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-06-07 18:25:29bobcatfishlinkissue18576 messages
2015-06-07 18:25:29bobcatfishcreate