Author eric.smith
Recipients docs@python, eimista, eric.smith, rhettinger, yselivanov
Date 2015-05-31.17:04:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1433091873.82.0.384025600568.issue24323@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I don't feel particularly strongly about it. It's mildly more confusing in the 3.x docs than 2.7 because it's the only use in that section of an optional argument.

I disagree that s.pop(i) is wrong, since it agrees with the "Results" column. But I agree it's not an improvement and we shouldn't encourage it.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-05-31 17:04:33eric.smithsetrecipients: + eric.smith, rhettinger, docs@python, yselivanov, eimista
2015-05-31 17:04:33eric.smithsetmessageid: <1433091873.82.0.384025600568.issue24323@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-05-31 17:04:33eric.smithlinkissue24323 messages
2015-05-31 17:04:33eric.smithcreate