➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.snow
Recipients Arfrever, Jim.Jewett, Mark.Shannon, alex, asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, eric.smith, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, flox, gregory.p.smith, introom, josh.r, mrabarnett, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, refi64, rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, tonn81, westurner, yselivanov
Date 2015-05-25.18:53:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CALFfu7Cgr9+UR2oSAxL_k17TTSpWF6ORiQie_oZxXRJX2Uy7vQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1432439629.61.0.544912035278.issue16991@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
> Should dictobject.h get a bit more changes?  In particular, should the following be expanded?
>
> #define PyDictKeys_Check(op) (Py_TYPE(op) == &PyDictKeys_Type)
> #define PyDictItems_Check(op) (Py_TYPE(op) == &PyDictItems_Type)
> #define PyDictValues_Check(op) (Py_TYPE(op) == &PyDictValues_Type)
> /* This excludes Values, since they are not sets. */
> # define PyDictViewSet_Check(op) \
>     (PyDictKeys_Check(op) || PyDictItems_Check(op))

I'm missing some context here.  I'm not sure how this relates to OrderedDict.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-05-25 18:53:53eric.snowsetrecipients: + eric.snow, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, mrabarnett, Arfrever, alex, asvetlov, flox, Mark.Shannon, Jim.Jewett, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, westurner, refi64, josh.r, tonn81, introom
2015-05-25 18:53:53eric.snowlinkissue16991 messages
2015-05-25 18:53:53eric.snowcreate