This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients belopolsky, larry, python-dev, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date 2015-05-19.13:33:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1432042417.79.0.387979764923.issue24215@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Sorry, I expected this issue be solved much faster.

Unfortunately Terry's recipe doesn't work. Here is a patch that reapplies changes that broke buildbots (additional tests for buildins and making test_pprint discoverable), and also fixes test_trace and makes it discoverable.

I found yet one issue with test_trace. It fails if run regrtest with the -m option (both patched and unpatched versions, there is no regression).

$ ./python -m test.regrtest test_trace
[1/1] test_trace
1 test OK.
$ ./python -m test.regrtest -m test_coverage test_trace
[1/1] test_trace
test test_trace failed -- Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/serhiy/py/cpython-3.4/Lib/test/test_trace.py", line 313, in test_coverage
    self.assertTrue("pprint.cover" in files)
AssertionError: False is not true

1 test failed:
    test_trace

It fails because run_unittest() is used in tested script. That is yet one argument against using test_pprint in test_trace.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-05-19 13:33:37serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, belopolsky, larry, r.david.murray, python-dev
2015-05-19 13:33:37serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1432042417.79.0.387979764923.issue24215@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-05-19 13:33:37serhiy.storchakalinkissue24215 messages
2015-05-19 13:33:37serhiy.storchakacreate