Message241883
I consider this as transitional style, for simpler converting to Argument Clinic without changing the behaviour. In future it can be replaced with bool.
But the bool converter has a downside. It is harder to extend it. We can't add a support of say a tuple, or callable, or string, or ternary logic value without potential breaking some code. I propose first convert all semantic boolean ints to the boolint converter, and then, after fundamental analysis, replace boolint with bool if there is no any sense to extend concrete parameter. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-04-23 19:56:46 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, larry |
2015-04-23 19:56:46 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1429819006.23.0.606448171208.issue24037@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-04-23 19:56:46 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue24037 messages |
2015-04-23 19:56:45 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|