➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author scoder
Recipients gvanrossum, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, pitrou, rhettinger, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2015-04-21.06:35:10
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1429598110.5.0.772374867813.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> should inspect.isgenerator() be changed?

Replying to myself, one thing that speaks against this approach is that "inspect" also has the functions "getgeneratorlocals()" and "getgeneratorstate()", which depend on "gen.gi_frame". Cython could emulate that, but normal user code usually can't. It's definitely not part of the Generator protocol but an implementation detail of GeneratorType.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-21 06:35:10scodersetrecipients: + scoder, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, lukasz.langa, martin.panter, yselivanov
2015-04-21 06:35:10scodersetmessageid: <1429598110.5.0.772374867813.issue24018@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-21 06:35:10scoderlinkissue24018 messages
2015-04-21 06:35:10scodercreate