Message241186
@r.david.murray and @flipmcf:
I've audited all test modules using sys.executable for a starting point, and these tests look like they could benefit from helper methods to invoke python (probably the ones in script_helper, but we may want to create others if the use cases don’t quite fit):
* _test_multiprocessing.py
* test_base64.py
* test_capi.py - some of this looks legitimate, but some of it could maybe benefit from the helpers
* test_cmd_line.py
* test_faulthandler.py
* test_file_eintr.py
* test_gc.py
* test_keyword.py
* test_pdb.py
* test_popen.py
* test_quopri.py
* test_site.py
* test_source_encoding.py
* test_sys.py
* test_sysconfig.py
* test_tcl.py - something complex is going on in here, not sure if it’s necessary or not
* test_threading.py
* test_pindent.py
* test_traceback.py
* test_unicodedata.py
* test_json/test_tool.py
@r.david.murray I'm going to start with test_unicodedata.py for a nice easy starting point so I'll create a separate issue for it.
@flipmcf should I start using your patch set as-is or is there more to come? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-04-16 01:01:43 | bobcatfish | set | recipients:
+ bobcatfish, ncoghlan, pitrou, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, BreamoreBoy, Rodrigue.Alcazar, flipmcf |
2015-04-16 01:01:43 | bobcatfish | set | messageid: <1429146103.45.0.190683385947.issue9517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-04-16 01:01:43 | bobcatfish | link | issue9517 messages |
2015-04-16 01:01:42 | bobcatfish | create | |
|