Message241030
The new API change looks doubtful for me. It is more verbose. And less readable. It makes harder to search in sources, because {'str', 'robuffer'} is the same as {'robuffer', 'str'}. If Argument Clinic would a tool with programmatic API, sets would make sense, but for now the main interface of Argument Clinic is text inclusions in C files.
If you want to convert the types parameter into a set, is it possible to continue to accept strings? Many user-friendly APIs accept either a sequence of string names or a string containing space-separated names. For example namedtuple, Enum. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-04-14 21:11:04 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, larry, zach.ware |
2015-04-14 21:11:04 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1429045864.78.0.679014479701.issue23935@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-04-14 21:11:04 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue23935 messages |
2015-04-14 21:11:04 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |
|