Author r.david.murray
Recipients alexandre.vassalotti, dstanek, grooverdan, r.david.murray, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka, thijs, wangchun
Date 2015-04-09.17:26:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1428600401.12.0.839282202021.issue5885@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The original report says the ctypes call is slower than the python code used as a fallback.  Would it not, then, be a performance improvement just to drop the ctypes call, without creating a new C module?  Creating a C module would then be a separate enhancement issue if someone thought the performance improvement was enough to justify the module.  Or maybe it could live in the os module?
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-09 17:26:41r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, dstanek, alexandre.vassalotti, wangchun, thijs, grooverdan, rosslagerwall, serhiy.storchaka
2015-04-09 17:26:41r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1428600401.12.0.839282202021.issue5885@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-09 17:26:41r.david.murraylinkissue5885 messages
2015-04-09 17:26:41r.david.murraycreate