Author gvanrossum
Recipients benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, nedbat, r.david.murray, rhettinger, sandro.tosi, sdougherty, swamiyeswanth, takayuki, terry.reedy
Date 2015-04-07.19:33:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJ+BTvrgoZXh-yLFErCRnsu4i9ehv9PMpg-74SarfymmuA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1428430889.34.0.458752996662.issue11205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
This needs a code patch. But it can only be fixed for 3.5.
On Apr 7, 2015 11:21 AM, "Steve Dougherty" <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Steve Dougherty added the comment:
>
> Any word on either changing the documentation to match the behaviour or
> fixing this as a bug?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +sdougherty
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11205>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-07 19:33:47gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, nedbat, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, swamiyeswanth, takayuki, sdougherty
2015-04-07 19:33:47gvanrossumlinkissue11205 messages
2015-04-07 19:33:47gvanrossumcreate