This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients alex, barry, bkabrda, doko, dstufft, janssen, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, rkuska, vstinner
Date 2015-04-05.10:32:26
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1428229946.62.0.471648994912.issue23857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As far as Alex's post goes, it's simply wrong, and I wish he had spoken to me about his frustrations with the significant challenges of infrastructure maintenance in large established organisations before posting it. Red Hat's been fighting the battle for better enterprise infrastructure management for 20 years at this point (including in the US public sector: https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/industries/government), but like almost all institutional reform, it's very slow going.

We offer plenty of options for folks to upgrade faster, and it's much easier for us when they do: http://www.curiousefficiency.org/posts/2015/04/stop-supporting-python26.html

So if you care about getting security enhancements rolled out in a way that means people responsible for infrastructure management in large organisations will actually adopt them, rather than dismissing them out of hand as "too risky", please take a moment to consider that we might have some idea what we're talking about.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-04-05 10:32:26ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, barry, doko, janssen, pitrou, vstinner, alex, r.david.murray, bkabrda, dstufft, rkuska
2015-04-05 10:32:26ncoghlansetmessageid: <1428229946.62.0.471648994912.issue23857@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-05 10:32:26ncoghlanlinkissue23857 messages
2015-04-05 10:32:26ncoghlancreate