Message239919
> If a Fortran array was allowed in a bytes-like context without memory copying, the order of the array elements would differ from the order returned by the meoryview.tobytes() method, which essentially is defined to copy them out in C-array or flattend-tolist() order.
I'm still not seeing how this would cause such an object to throw an error if used in a bytes-like context. I presume by the above that you mean that the results of passing the object directly to a bytes like context differs from the results of calling .tobytes() on it and passing *that* to the bytes like context. That's not what your suggested documentation change says, though. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-04-02 14:57:07 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, pitrou, ezio.melotti, skrah, docs@python, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-04-02 14:57:07 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1427986627.6.0.349481940994.issue23756@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-04-02 14:57:07 | r.david.murray | link | issue23756 messages |
2015-04-02 14:57:07 | r.david.murray | create | |
|