Author paul.moore
Recipients NaCl, bwanamarko, paul.moore, r.david.murray, steve.dower, terry.reedy, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2015-03-20.20:35:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1426883714.62.0.827702022605.issue22516@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> 99% of Python users should be getting a distribution rather than the python.org installers

I'm not at all convinced by this logic. On Windows, as far as I'm aware, the only "major" Python distributions are Anaconda and Enthought, both of which are intended mainly for the scientific community.

What "distribution" would you suggest for a web developer? For a system admin who wants to write automation scripts? For a database admin doing reporting and automation? For an application developer planning on packaging his application with py2exe/cx_freeze? For a game developer embedding Python? I'd assume all of those target audiences would use the python.org installers.

Honestly, my guess (conceded, this is based on no actual metrics) would be that 99% of Windows users use the python.org installers, certainly not the other way around.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-03-20 20:35:14paul.mooresetrecipients: + paul.moore, terry.reedy, tim.golden, r.david.murray, zach.ware, steve.dower, bwanamarko, NaCl
2015-03-20 20:35:14paul.mooresetmessageid: <1426883714.62.0.827702022605.issue22516@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-03-20 20:35:14paul.moorelinkissue22516 messages
2015-03-20 20:35:14paul.moorecreate