Message238655
There were a couple mistakes I found; see Reitveld. I was going to say to leave the open(mode="r") parameter as it is, since an explicit "r" is more readable, but since you already took some out, I’m not going to complain.
While many of the changes look worthwhile, I do worry that some of them will never be tested (at least until say Python 3.14 or something). E.g. I just tried running Tools/scripts/dutree.py cos it looked interesting, but was confronted with the “unorderable types: int() < NoneType()” Python 2-ism. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-03-20 12:36:25 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, rhettinger, vstinner, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-03-20 12:36:25 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1426854985.87.0.777793725937.issue22831@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-03-20 12:36:25 | martin.panter | link | issue22831 messages |
2015-03-20 12:36:25 | martin.panter | create | |
|