Message238577
I'm not sure what you mean by "Siphash isn't cryptographically secure". One of the key points of Siphash is that it *is* cryptographically secure. It has a smaller space than your typical hash function (MD5, SHA1, SHA2, etc) which means that collisions themselves are more likely, but the hash itself is cryptographically secure against pre-image attacks and it has collision resistance (collision resistance is different than just getting a collision). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-03-19 22:57:28 | dstufft | set | recipients:
+ dstufft, rhettinger |
2015-03-19 22:57:28 | dstufft | set | messageid: <1426805848.11.0.534869590204.issue23712@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-03-19 22:57:28 | dstufft | link | issue23712 messages |
2015-03-19 22:57:28 | dstufft | create | |
|