Message 238372 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	nikratio
Recipients	Arfrever, martin.panter, nikratio, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2015-03-18.02:31:13
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1426645874.26.0.290549655316.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
If you want to add support for buffer_size=0 in a separate patch/issue I think that's fine. But in that case I would not add a buffer_size parameter now at all. IMO, not having it is better as having it but not supporting zero (even if it's documented that's pretty surprising).

If you want to add support for buffer_size=0 in a separate patch/issue I think that's fine. But in that case I would not add a buffer_size parameter now at all. IMO, not having it is better as having it but not supporting zero (even if it's documented that's pretty surprising).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-03-18 02:31:14	nikratio	set	recipients: + nikratio, pitrou, Arfrever, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2015-03-18 02:31:14	nikratio	set	messageid: <1426645874.26.0.290549655316.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-03-18 02:31:14	nikratio	link	issue23529 messages
2015-03-18 02:31:13	nikratio	create