This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ned.deily
Recipients benhoyt, larry, ned.deily, paul.moore, python-dev, steve.dower, terry.reedy, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware
Date 2015-03-09.22:55:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1425941716.16.0.34922921101.issue23619@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
"Not sure that we have any precedent for dealing with tests that require admin privileges when installed but not in the source tree?"

I think we do.  With the OS X installer (and, in theory, other Posix-style installs), we have a similar situation where tests are installed without a source tree and I believe they should be expected to be runnable by the user without admin privileges, where necessary, skipping those few test cases that *might* actually need elevated privs.  Granted, we currently don't do a lot of systematic testing of tests from installed locations.  I do as part of the OS X installer building and testing.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-03-09 22:55:16ned.deilysetrecipients: + ned.deily, terry.reedy, paul.moore, vstinner, larry, tim.golden, benhoyt, python-dev, zach.ware, steve.dower
2015-03-09 22:55:16ned.deilysetmessageid: <1425941716.16.0.34922921101.issue23619@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-03-09 22:55:16ned.deilylinkissue23619 messages
2015-03-09 22:55:16ned.deilycreate