➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients barry, cvrebert, ethan.furman, gregory.p.smith, martin.panter, r.david.murray, takluyver
Date 2015-02-10.01:50:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1423533037.31.0.666443384632.issue23342@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Have you seen the code review comments on the Rietveld, <https://bugs.python.org/review/23342>? (Maybe check spam emails.) Many of the comments from the earlier patches still stand. In particular, I would like to see the “input” default value addressed, at least for the new run() function, if not the old check_output() function.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-02-10 01:50:37martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, barry, gregory.p.smith, r.david.murray, cvrebert, ethan.furman, takluyver
2015-02-10 01:50:37martin.pantersetmessageid: <1423533037.31.0.666443384632.issue23342@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-02-10 01:50:37martin.panterlinkissue23342 messages
2015-02-10 01:50:36martin.pantercreate