Message235483
dir() will get me TracebackException as a name, help(traceback.TracebackException) will get me its signature. IDEs with autocomplete and signature tooltips will do the same.
There is nothing in those usage sequences to say "don't use __init__, use this redundant class method with the same signature instead".
I agree providing a "directly from an exception" constructor is essential for cases where you're working with a caught exception at the Python level. I don't agree with the idea of duplicating the required low level API under a different name so it doesn't *look* like a lower level API in the documentation. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-02-06 13:31:41 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, gvanrossum, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, rbcollins, eric.snow, yselivanov, adaptivelogic, martius |
2015-02-06 13:31:41 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1423229501.23.0.469429869729.issue17911@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-02-06 13:31:41 | ncoghlan | link | issue17911 messages |
2015-02-06 13:31:41 | ncoghlan | create | |
|