Message235434
I take it the silence means that the patch is neither obviously good nor obviously bad. :-)
It all comes down to a judgment call: is this a bug, or expected (but undocumented) behavior?
In PEP 387 lingo: Is this a "reasonable bug fix"? Or is it a "design mistake", thus calling for a FutureWarning first, and the actual change later?
>>> ipaddress.IPv4Interface('1.2.3.4/16') + 1
__main__:1: FutureWarning: Arithmetic on IPv4Interface objects will
change in Python 3.6. If you rely on the current behavior, change
'interface + n' to 'IPv4Interface(interface.ip + n, 32)' |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-02-05 12:52:51 | kwi.dk | set | recipients:
+ kwi.dk, ncoghlan, pmoody |
2015-02-05 12:52:50 | kwi.dk | set | messageid: <1423140770.99.0.710527799709.issue22941@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-02-05 12:52:50 | kwi.dk | link | issue22941 messages |
2015-02-05 12:52:50 | kwi.dk | create | |
|