Author rhansen
Recipients pitrou, rhansen, seberg, skrah
Date 2015-02-01.09:39:42
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1422783583.0.0.227532114486.issue23352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
My preference is to apply the patch, of course.  There is a legitimate concern that it will break existing code, but I think there are more points in favor of applying the patch:
  * there exists code that the current behavior is known to break
  * it's easier to remove assert(view->suboffsets == NULL) than to
    change producers to not provide an all-negative array (though I
    admit there may be other more subtle ways the patch would break
    existing code)
  * I may be the only one who has spoken up about this, but I doubt
    I'm the only one who has experienced it
History
Date User Action Args
2015-02-01 09:39:43rhansensetrecipients: + rhansen, pitrou, skrah, seberg
2015-02-01 09:39:43rhansensetmessageid: <1422783583.0.0.227532114486.issue23352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-02-01 09:39:42rhansenlinkissue23352 messages
2015-02-01 09:39:42rhansencreate