This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rbcollins
Recipients adaptivelogic, eric.snow, gvanrossum, martius, ncoghlan, pitrou, rbcollins, rhettinger, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2015-01-26.21:48:40
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
And for profit, review changes applied (minus the small number I disagreed with). I've clarified in the code why the exc_info tuple break out is still used (compat with the legacy API is the strongest argument).

I haven't fleshed out the locals thing properly yet, I'm going to do one more iteration on that then ask for a final review before committing. (Unless we're in freeze ATM ?)
Date User Action Args
2015-01-26 21:48:44rbcollinssetrecipients: + rbcollins, gvanrossum, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.snow, yselivanov, adaptivelogic, martius
2015-01-26 21:48:41rbcollinssetmessageid: <>
2015-01-26 21:48:41rbcollinslinkissue17911 messages
2015-01-26 21:48:41rbcollinscreate