This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author steve.dower
Recipients brett.cannon, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware
Date 2015-01-24.16:49:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1422118162.12.0.787477331696.issue23253@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I assume you're referring to normal_startup and startup_nosite in perf.py at h.p.o/benchmarks? Handy to know about (I need to explore our top-level repos more often, obviously), but probably still not going to measure time in the Windows PE loader as accurately as it'd need to be to conclusively prove a speed advantage. I'd probably need to hit up the Windows team for some of their profiling tools to get good numbers here.

Still, it's indisputable that this change will reduce the initial memory overhead, so I'll take Tim's 0.75 and run with it :)
History
Date User Action Args
2015-01-24 16:49:22steve.dowersetrecipients: + steve.dower, brett.cannon, tim.golden, zach.ware
2015-01-24 16:49:22steve.dowersetmessageid: <1422118162.12.0.787477331696.issue23253@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-01-24 16:49:22steve.dowerlinkissue23253 messages
2015-01-24 16:49:21steve.dowercreate