Message234605
The reference to @functools.total_ordering was actually already there; I just moved it into the paragraph about relationships between the operators. I should also point out that my description of the default __ne__() assumes that Issue 21408 is resolved; the current behaviour is slightly different.
If you think something else could be added to the patch, I’m happy to try and add it. Perhaps the default object.__eq__() behaviour? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-01-24 12:40:46 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, rhettinger, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, medwards, cvrebert, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, berker.peksag, franck, antocuni |
2015-01-24 12:40:46 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1422103246.05.0.874048467624.issue4395@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-01-24 12:40:46 | martin.panter | link | issue4395 messages |
2015-01-24 12:40:45 | martin.panter | create | |
|