This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author tim.peters
Recipients Devin Jeanpierre, cvrebert, ezio.melotti, facundobatista, josh.r, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, skrah, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2015-01-10.03:08:16
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
This is easy:  Cowlishaw is wrong on this one, but nothing can be done about it ;-)

Confusion arises because most people think of 0**0 as a value (where it certainly must be 1) while others seem to view it as some kind of shorthand for expressing a limit (as the base and/or exponent _approach_ 0, in which case there is no correct answer - it's an "indeterminate form").

It's in the "spirit of 754" to take inputs at face value, viewing them as infinitely precise.  So viewing 0**0 as anything other than 1 in this context is perverse.

Centuries of history distilled to a few paragraphs here:
Date User Action Args
2015-01-10 03:08:17tim.peterssetrecipients: + tim.peters, rhettinger, facundobatista, mark.dickinson, vstinner, Devin Jeanpierre, ezio.melotti, steven.daprano, cvrebert, skrah, josh.r
2015-01-10 03:08:17tim.peterssetmessageid: <>
2015-01-10 03:08:17tim.peterslinkissue23201 messages
2015-01-10 03:08:16tim.peterscreate