Message233545
Here is what I have so far:
- complete tests for bytes and bytearry (bytearray currently commented out at line 71)
- pep461 implemented for bytes
This is basically an adaptation of the 2.7 code for str, adjusted appropriately.
I was planning on having bytearray convert to bytes, then call the bytes code, then integrate the results back into the existing bytearray (for %=) or create and return a new bytearray (for %).
I can easily believe this is not the most efficient way to do it. ;)
I should have the bytearray portion done, if not this weekend, then by the following weekend.
I have no objections if Victor wants to combine and optimize with the unicode implementation (and no need to wait for me to finish the bytearray portion). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-01-06 16:04:43 | ethan.furman | set | recipients:
+ ethan.furman, nascheme, ncoghlan, vstinner, eric.smith, Arfrever, martin.panter |
2015-01-06 16:04:41 | ethan.furman | set | messageid: <1420560281.27.0.0945494323224.issue20284@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-01-06 16:04:41 | ethan.furman | link | issue20284 messages |
2015-01-06 16:04:41 | ethan.furman | create | |
|