Author ethan.furman
Recipients Arfrever, eric.smith, ethan.furman, martin.panter, nascheme, ncoghlan, vstinner
Date 2015-01-06.16:04:38
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1420560281.27.0.0945494323224.issue20284@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Here is what I have so far:

  - complete tests for bytes and bytearry (bytearray currently commented out at line 71)
  - pep461 implemented for bytes

This is basically an adaptation of the 2.7 code for str, adjusted appropriately.

I was planning on having bytearray convert to bytes, then call the bytes code, then integrate the results back into the existing bytearray (for %=) or create and return a new bytearray (for %).

I can easily believe this is not the most efficient way to do it.  ;)

I should have the bytearray portion done, if not this weekend, then by the following weekend.

I have no objections if Victor wants to combine and optimize with the unicode implementation (and no need to wait for me to finish the bytearray portion).
History
Date User Action Args
2015-01-06 16:04:43ethan.furmansetrecipients: + ethan.furman, nascheme, ncoghlan, vstinner, eric.smith, Arfrever, martin.panter
2015-01-06 16:04:41ethan.furmansetmessageid: <1420560281.27.0.0945494323224.issue20284@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-01-06 16:04:41ethan.furmanlinkissue20284 messages
2015-01-06 16:04:41ethan.furmancreate