Author mdcb808@gmail.com
Recipients Arfrever, belopolsky, ethan.furman, lemburg, mdcb808@gmail.com, vstinner
Date 2014-12-19.00:40:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1418949659.65.0.205046989771.issue23084@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'm fine my patch doesn't resolve the "nanosecond support", but that doesn't mean the issue is closed per say.

Ref. to PEP410 rejection and de facto standard seems a bit expeditive.

assuming it worked, this would somewhat be more agreeable ?

>class timestamp(int): pass
>  """measure of time expressed as a number of nanoseconds"""
History
Date User Action Args
2014-12-19 00:40:59mdcb808@gmail.comsetrecipients: + mdcb808@gmail.com, lemburg, belopolsky, vstinner, Arfrever, ethan.furman
2014-12-19 00:40:59mdcb808@gmail.comsetmessageid: <1418949659.65.0.205046989771.issue23084@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-19 00:40:59mdcb808@gmail.comlinkissue23084 messages
2014-12-19 00:40:59mdcb808@gmail.comcreate